🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart nuclear negotiations with the United States provided that it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue produced results, and shared new appeals had come from go-betweens to reopen negotiations with the US government. He asserted Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Navigating a Difficult Route

The foreign minister is treading a challenging course since Iran wishes not to appear to be operating from a position of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more powerful in military terms and mentally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Negotiations Abruptly Terminated

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the American leader declaring the facilities had been obliterated. Subsequently, European countries employed their privilege to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the talks that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Representatives asserted on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Position

Tehran representatives stated the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the offer could be reintroduced in various formats if negotiations reopen.

Trump in recent days claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials state they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from Washington either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of passivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Position

In his address to the gathering, aimed to paint the US as a controlling nation that misuses the idea of worldwide standards, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement revealed the clash could not be settled by combat operations. He asserted the assaults commenced with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust hard to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Primary Solution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had always sought to enforce their desires during the talks. Diplomacy can still be active and continues the ultimate solution to settle disagreements, but its standards, regulations and principles must be respected."

"Provided that they talk to the nation of Iran with the language of respect and honor, they will receive a response in the equivalent approach."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the struggle of restoration and reconstruction, the foreign minister stated he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We learned many lessons from this conflict; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He continued: "We managed to survive this war. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to destroy, remains in place. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is important is the will of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but were unable to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have grown more powerful, more cohesive, and more backing of the government and the nation in the wake of this attack."